�Ӱ���Ƶ

�Ӱ���Ƶ fell five slots to 39^th in from a collaboration between The Wall Street Journal and Times Higher Education (WSJ/THE) publications. Now in its third year, the list is touted as an accounting of the factors most important to prospective students and their families—specifically, their learning experiences on campus, and outcomes after graduation. In 2017, the school stood at 34^th, while in 2016—the inaugural year—it was 37^th.

“I am disappointed to see that our overall ranking slipped,” President Barbara R. Snyder said.  “We can be proud of some of the individual categories in which we did well—for example, in outcomes and resources factors—but need to focus more on areas we need to improve—such as student engagement and faculty diversity.”

�Ӱ���Ƶ’s highest WSJ/THE score came in the graduate salary category, which measures the “value added” that the university adds to a graduate’s compensation. The publications report using statistical modeling of expected results based on student demographics and institutional factors and then compares them to actual outcomes. The approach, they note, “looks at the success of the college in transforming people’s life chances.” On a scale of 0 to 100, CWRU scored 99.8 in salaries (in other words, pay much higher than expected) and 89.6 in loan default rates (defaults much lower than expected). CWRU’s other particularly high score came in “finance per student,” which tallies a university's overall spending on learning, divides the amount by the number of undergraduate and graduate students, and finally adjusts for regional variation in prices. The university’s total for this category was 99.4. The university’s lowest score—6.6—came in the category measuring the proportion of Pell Grant recipients and first-generation students. Other low marks came in international reputation, faculty diversity and papers published in peer-reviewed journals per faculty member. The full results can be found on the .