 Michael Clune, the Samuel B. and Virginia C. Knight Professor of Humanities, reviewed Paper Minds: Literature and the Ecology of Consciousness by Jonathan Kramnick for the Los Angeles Review of Books.
In his review, Clune wrote about how Kramnick’s piece demonstrated how the literary studies discipline can maintain its identity, while also bringing insights to other fields.
Clune also explained why he disagreed with the approach the author took to some arguments in the book, and why he would ultimately suggest the piece to others.
Michael Clune, the Samuel B. and Virginia C. Knight Professor of Humanities, reviewed Paper Minds: Literature and the Ecology of Consciousness by Jonathan Kramnick for the Los Angeles Review of Books.
In his review, Clune wrote about how Kramnick’s piece demonstrated how the literary studies discipline can maintain its identity, while also bringing insights to other fields.
Clune also explained why he disagreed with the approach the author took to some arguments in the book, and why he would ultimately suggest the piece to others.
 
            English’s Michael Clune reviews book about literary studies
 Michael Clune, the Samuel B. and Virginia C. Knight Professor of Humanities, reviewed Paper Minds: Literature and the Ecology of Consciousness by Jonathan Kramnick for the Los Angeles Review of Books.
In his review, Clune wrote about how Kramnick’s piece demonstrated how the literary studies discipline can maintain its identity, while also bringing insights to other fields.
Clune also explained why he disagreed with the approach the author took to some arguments in the book, and why he would ultimately suggest the piece to others.
Michael Clune, the Samuel B. and Virginia C. Knight Professor of Humanities, reviewed Paper Minds: Literature and the Ecology of Consciousness by Jonathan Kramnick for the Los Angeles Review of Books.
In his review, Clune wrote about how Kramnick’s piece demonstrated how the literary studies discipline can maintain its identity, while also bringing insights to other fields.
Clune also explained why he disagreed with the approach the author took to some arguments in the book, and why he would ultimately suggest the piece to others.
 
   
 
